close

Suicide-Safe Publishing Checklist

A practical checklist for anyone publishing content that mentions or discusses suicide - including charities, journalists, bloggers, social media creators and community organisations.

Irresponsible content about suicide can contribute to imitative behaviour and cause distress to bereaved readers. Responsible content can encourage people to seek help and reduce stigma. This checklist helps you get it right.

If you or someone you know is in crisis: Samaritans - call 116 123 (free, 24/7) | Crisis Text Line - text SHOUT to 85258 | NHS - call 111, mental health option | Emergency - call 999

Before You Write

  • Do I need to include this detail? Could the story be told without it?
  • Am I writing this to genuinely help people, or to generate engagement?
  • Have I read the Samaritans media guidelines?
  • Will bereaved people encounter this content? Have I considered their experience?
  • If this involves a real person, have I obtained consent from the family or individual?

Language

Use

  • "Died by suicide" or "took their own life"
  • "Suicide attempt" (not "failed attempt" or "successful suicide")
  • "Person who has experienced suicidal thoughts"
  • Plain, factual language

Avoid

  • "Committed suicide" - implies criminality
  • "Failed attempt" - implies the goal was death
  • "Successful suicide" - implies death is an achievement
  • Dramatic or romanticising language: "ended the pain", "found peace", "chose to leave"
  • Casual references: using "suicide" as a metaphor or joke

Content

Never include

  • Methods or means used
  • Specific locations
  • Suicide notes or final messages
  • Step-by-step details of what happened
  • Graphic images or video
  • Countdown-style narratives ("in his final hours...")

Always include

  • Crisis support information - prominently, not buried at the bottom
  • A message that help is available
  • Information about what to do if you are worried about someone
  • Context that suicidal thoughts are common and treatable

Headlines and Social Media

  • Do not use the word "suicide" in a sensational headline
  • Do not include methods or locations in headlines or social posts
  • Do not use the story as clickbait
  • Include crisis information in social media posts, not just the linked article
  • Consider whether the headline could appear alongside ads or unrelated content in a harmful way

Images

  • Do not use images of the location where someone died
  • Do not use images of methods or means
  • Do not use images that could identify the person without family consent
  • Use images that convey hope, support or connection - not despair
  • Consider using no image at all rather than a harmful one

Bereavement

  • Remember that bereaved people will read your content
  • Include links to suicide bereavement support services
  • Do not speculate about reasons or blame
  • Do not contact bereaved families for comment without extreme care and sensitivity
  • Do not publish details that could identify children or vulnerable family members

Website and Page Design

  • Place crisis information above the fold or near the top of the page
  • Make phone numbers clickable on mobile
  • Use a visually distinct crisis box (different background colour, border)
  • Do not hide crisis information behind accordions, tabs or "read more" buttons
  • Ensure the page loads quickly - someone in distress should not wait
  • Consider adding a "leave site quickly" button if your content could be found by someone in a controlling situation
  • Repeat crisis information at the end of longer articles

Final Check

  • Is crisis support information visible near the top?
  • Have I removed methods, locations and graphic details?
  • Is the language safe (no "committed", no romanticising)?
  • Have I considered bereaved readers?
  • Is the headline responsible?
  • Are phone numbers clickable on mobile?
  • Have I included information for people worried about someone else?
  • Would I be comfortable if someone currently in crisis read this?
  • Have I asked someone else to review this before publishing?